Navas v. Baca et al
| Julio Cesar Navas |
| James Baca and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2010cv00647 |
| October 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
160
ORDER that the pro se application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 159 ) is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDERED that the second-amended petition (ECF No. 64 ) is DENIED in its entirety. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. To the extent that petitioner's two earlier motions for a certificate of appealability (ECF Nos. 142 and 147 ) are properly before this court, they are both DENIED. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Clerk of the Court shall file and serve a copy of this order with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in case no. 19-71100. (Ad hoc email Service (NEF) to 9th Circuit on 5/22/2019; paper copy mailed 5/22/2019.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
153
USCA Docketing Letter re pro se petition for Writ of Mandamus. USCA Case Number 19-71100 assigned. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDERED that the pro se application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 123 ) is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER denying ECF No. 72 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot ECF No. 79 Petitioner's Motion to Strike Respondents' Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents sha ll file an answer to petitioner's grounds for relief by 08/26/2017 and Petitioner shall have 30 days following service of respondents' answer in which to file a reply. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 07/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 51 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Ryan Norwood withdrawn from the case. Attorney Mark D. Eibert for Julio Cesar Navas appointed. Second amended petition due within 90 days. Parties shall send courtesy copies of stat e court record exhibits to Reno division of this court. Motion to strike 58 is granted. Motion for withdrawal 49 and motion for appointment of counsel 57 are stricken. Please see attached for further details/deadlines. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/25/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT without prejudice in favor of Nevada Attorney General, James Baca against Julio Cesar Navas. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 05/17/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDERED that Rs # 29 Motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART: The Court holds that the claims specified herein are not exhausted: (see pdf Order for specifics) FURTHER ORD that P;s # 32 Motion to stay is DENIED. FURTHER ORD P shall have until 4/5/201 3 to file a motion for dismissal without prejudice of the entire petition or for partial dismissal only of the unexhausted claims. FURTHER ORD that the standard response and reply times under Local Rule LR 7-2 shall apply to any such motion filed, ex cept that the response time shall run from the filing of the verification rather than the motion itself. FURTHER ORD that P's # 35 Motion for an extension of time is GRANTED nunc pro tunc in connection with the previously-filed # 37 Reply. FUR THER ORD that, for all papers filed hereafter in this action, counsel shall comply with Special Order 108 as to all individuals who were minors at the time of the operative events. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/5/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER that, within 45 days of entry of this order, Rs shall file a motion to dismiss restricted to exhaustion issues only. FURTHER ORD that briefing will proceed on the motion to dismiss and any motion for a stay filed thereafter as per the standard schedule for same under the local rules. FURTHER ORD that any request for a stay to exhaust the unexhausted claims must be sought by a separate motion. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 5/30/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER. Petitioner's 11 Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED and the time for petitioner to file an amended petition is extended up to and including Tuesday, 9/6/2011. (Amended Petition due by 9/6/2011.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 8/9/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender's Office is appointed as counsel for petitioner, with Ryan Norwood, Esq. appearing as petitioner's counsel of record. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion for scheduling order 9 is GRANTED and that petitioner shall have until 7/22/2011 to file an amended petition. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the CJA Coordinator for this Division (ack'd).(Amended Petition due by 7/22/2011.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) Modified on 3/14/2011 to reflect that a copy of this Order was sent to petitioner.(MLC).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
