Ally Financial Inc. v. Bosch et al
| Ally Financial Inc. |
| Herbert L. Bosch, Jr., Lee A. Bosch, Mary Lou Bosch, Susan R. Bosch and Bosch Motors Inc. |
| 3:2010cv00677 |
| October 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 82 motion and dismissing defendants Mary Lou Bosch and Susan R. Bosch. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/26/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
76
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER re 69 Emergency Motion. This order shall become effective upon Ally's service of Order on counsel for Defendants by personal delivery and posting of bond in amount of $10,000. Order to show cause hearing sha ll be held on Ally's application on May 29, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/23/13. Please see attached for further details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 53 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING Plaintiff's 61 Objections to evidence submitted in response to 53 Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 03/29/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
