Cunditt v. High Desert State Prison et al
Petitioner: William J. Cunditt
Respondent: High Desert State Prison and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Case Number: 3:2011cv00785
Filed: October 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 JUDGMENT - This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for petitioner's failure to obey this court's # 12 Order of December 14, 2011. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 2/1/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDERED that P's # 13 Motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. FURTHER ORD that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for P's failure to obey this court's 12 Order of December 14, 2011. The clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly. FURT HER ORD that all pending motions are DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORD that the clerk SHALL return the miscellaneous documents submitted by P without placing them on the docket. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 1/31/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 2/1/2012 to reflect thaat specified documents returned to P 2/1/2012 via U.S. Mail (DRM).
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED the petitioner's 4 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall, within 30 days, either (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee or (2) file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. FFURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner does not timely comply with this Court, dismissal of this action may result. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall s end plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis form with instructions (sent). FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall retain the petition, but shall not file at this time. (Payment of filing fees due 1/13/2012.) (Notice of Compliance is due by 1/13/2012.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 12/13/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunditt v. High Desert State Prison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William J. Cunditt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: High Desert State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?