Parkes v. Cox et al
Plaintiff: Robert E. Parkes
Defendant: Jim Burton, Greg Cox, Scott Nagle and Jack Palmer
Case Number: 3:2011cv00902
Filed: December 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER adopting and accepting 79 Report and Recommendation; granting Defendants' 66 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 69 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice Plaint iff's retaliation claim; directing that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff with respect to the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim and Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/25/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 1/13/2015, denying as moot 76 Motion - Request for Status Check. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
July 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 7/8/2014, denying Defendants' 70 Motion to Strike. Defendants' reply re 66 Motion for Summary Judgment due 7/22/2014. Defendants' opposition to 69 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment due 7/22/2014. Plaintiff's reply re 69 Cross-Motion due 8/5/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
April 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER on 58 Motion to Compel : Defendants shall make the required productions as ordered herein within 15 days of the date of this order. Further : First, within 20 days of the date of this order, the parties must meet and confer to discuss any remaining discovery dispute. Second, if the parties cannot informally resolve their discovery dispute, counsel for Defendants shall promptly contact the courtroom administrator to schedule a telephonic discovery conference. Third, not later 5 days before the conference, counsel for Defendants shall file a status report identifying the discovery dispute and the parties' respective positions pertaining thereto. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/9/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
October 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER re 37 Second Amended Complaint filed by Robert E. Parkes. Counsel for defendants shall advise court re acceptance of service within 21 days. (Please see attached for further details.) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/3/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
September 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDERED that plaintiff shall have an extension until 10/20/2013 to file his amended complaint in conformance with this order. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send to plaintiff a blank form for filing a civil rights complaint as well as the Information and Instructions for Filing a Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ( Form & instructions transmitted to P electronically at NNCC. ) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/20/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re 8 USCA Referral Order : This Court CERTIFIES that any in forma pauperis appeal from its order dated February 6, 2012 (ECF No. 3) is taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). FURTHER ORD Clerk SHALL SEND this order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (Email to USCA 9th Ckt. on 3/14/2012.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/13/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, in its entirety, for failure to state a claim. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 2/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parkes v. Cox et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jim Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Nagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert E. Parkes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?