Rush v. Palmer et al
Petitioner: John Rush
Respondent: Jack Palmer and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2012cv00012
Filed: January 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 19 Motion for Relief from Order Denying Petition. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that respondents' motion to dismiss 10 is GRANTED and the federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as untimely. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 5/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDERED that P's # 8 Motion to add additional claims is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the document at ECF # 8 , which the court shall construe as a Statement of Additional Claims and hereinafter refer to the do cument as such, on Rs. ( E-service 2/6/2012 by regeneration. ) FURTHER ORD Rs' answer/response to 4 Petition due by 3/22/2012. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have 45 days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply. FURTHER ORDERED that P's # 5 Motion for appointment of counsel and # 7 Motion to extend prison copywork limit are both DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rush v. Palmer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jack Palmer
Represented By: Daniel M. Roche
Represented By: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Represented By: Daniel M. Roche
Represented By: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Rush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?