Richmond v. Nevada Attorney General
| Daniel C. Richmond |
| Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer |
| 3:2012cv00348 |
| June 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Howard D. McKibben |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDERED P's # 16 Motion for relief from order and # 20 Amended motion for relief from order both are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED P's # 17 Motion to raise his copy credit limit is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall SEND petitioner with this order a copy of the entirety of ## 4 , 5 , 16 & 20 . (Mailed 2/19/2014.) Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 2/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER denying 14 Motion for Entry of Order Granting Relief. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/22/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Petition for writ of habeas corpus, as amended, shall be DISMISSED without prejudice. 7 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, 8 Motion to Raise Copy Credit Limit, and 11 Motion for Directed Verdict are DENIED. 9 Motion for Clari fication is GRANTED only to limited extent that the Court confirms that #5 was filed. Certificate of appealability is DENIED. The order of dismissal also certifies to the Court of Appeals that an appeal would not be ta ken in good faith, over and above denying a certificate of appealability. Clerk shall serve copy upon AG Catherine Cortez-Masto (service completed 10/3/12). No response required from respondents in this matter other than to respond to orders of any reviewing court. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/3/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that, within 30 days, petitioner shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why petition, as amended, should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of exhaustion (Show Cause Response due by 8/12/2012). FURTHER ORDERED, as previously directed, Clerk shall separately file and docket the motions accompanying original petition.Please see attached for further details. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 7/13/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER GRANTING 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and petitioner shall not be required to pay the $5.00 filing fee. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the petition andaccompanying motions and papers (Ack'd). IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice, subject to leave to amend within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. The Clerk of Court shall send petitioner: (1) one copy of a noncapital Section 2 254 petition form; (2) one copy of the instructions for same; (3) two copies of the original petition(## 1-1 & 1-2); and (4) one copy of the remaining papers that he submitted (sent to petitioner).(Amended Petition due by 7/29/2012.) Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/29/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
