Kinford v. Palmer
| Steven M. Kinford |
| Jack Palmer |
| 3:2012cv00489 |
| September 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
ORDERED that Petitioner Steven Kinford's second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 84 ) is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to substitu te Tim Garrett for Respondent Harold Wickham, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Main Document 128 replaced on 8/2/2022) (DRM). Modified on 8/2/2022 to correct spelling (DRM).
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting ECF No. 124 Motion to Extend Time. Kinford has until January 19, 2022, to file his reply in support of his second amended petition. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/20/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER granting ECF No. 122 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner has until January 5, 2022, to file his reply in support of his second amended petition (ECF No. 84 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER granting ECF No. 120 Motion to Extend Time; Replies due by 12/6/2021. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER granting 118 Motion to Extend Time : Reply to ECF No. 117 Answer re ECF No. 84 Second amended petition due by 10/5/2021. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER - The Sixth Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 115 ) is granted. Respondents have until June 7, 2021, to answer the surviving claims of the Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 84 ). The Fifth Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 114 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/4/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER granting ECF No. 112 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents have until May 27, 2021, to answer the surviving claims of the second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 84 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER granting ECF No. 110 Motion to Extend Time : Respondents have until May 13, 2021, to answer the surviving claims of the second amended petition for writ of habeas Corpus (ECF No. 84 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/5/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting ECF No. 108 Motion to Extend Time (Second Request). Respondents have until April 29, 2021, to answer the surviving claims of the second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 84 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/13/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER granting ECF No. 106 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents have until March 15, 2021, to answer the surviving claims of the Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 84 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/12/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER - Respondents' motion to dismiss certain grounds in the petition (ECF No. 92 ) is granted in part; Respondents' answer to the surviving claims 1, 2(B), 2(C), 3(A), 3(C), and 3(D) of ECF No. 84 Second Amended Petition due by 1/12/2021; Petitioner will have 60 days following service of Respondents' answer in which to file a reply. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER - Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 101 ) is granted. Respondents have until April 22, 2020, to file a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 92 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER granting ECF No. 99 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents have until April 17, 2020, to file a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 92 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/13/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER granting ECF No. 97 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 92 Motion to Dismiss. Reply due by 4/10/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER granting ECF No. 93 Motion to Extend Time : Response to ECF No. 92 Motion to Dismiss due by 3/4/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER granting ECF No. 87 Motion to Extend Time : Answer/response to ECF No. 84 Second Amended Petition due by 12/6/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER granting ECF No. 82 Stipulation; Petitioner's second amended petition for habeas corpus relief due by 8/6/2019; all other deadlines set forth in the Court's order of May 24, 2019, remain in effect. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER - Respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 56 ) is denied without prejudice to raising whatever procedural issues remain upon petitioners return to federal court. Respondents' motion for leave to file excess pages (ECF No. 68 ) is granted. Petitioner's motion for issuance of stay and abeyance (ECF No. 61 ) is granted. This action is stayed pending exhaustion. The grant of a stay is conditioned upon petitioner filing a state post-conviction petition by 11/13/2016 and returning to federal court with a motion to reopen within 45 days of issuance of the remittitur. As a condition of the stay, petitioner must exhaust all of his unexhausted claims in state court during the stay of this action. Clerk administratively close this action, until such time as the Court grants a motion to reopen the matter. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/29/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER - Counsel for petitioner shall meet with petitioner as soon as reasonably possible. Petitioner shall have 60 days to file and serve on respondents an amended petition, respondents shall have 30 days to answer, and petitioner shall have 30 day s to reply. Any state court exhibits shall be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits shall be forwarded to staff attorneys in Reno. (Amended Petition due by 4/19/2014.) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 02/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDERED Respondents' # 20 Motion to dismiss is denied. Further ordered Petitioner's # 16 Motion for records is denied. Further ordered Respondents' # 39 Motion to strike is granted; Clerk shall strike # 38 from the record. Furthe r ordered Petitioner's # 32 Question construed as a motion for counsel is granted; the FPD is appointed to represent petitioner. (FPD added to docket.) Further ordered Clerk shall E-serve FPD this order and # 10 Petition ( E-service 1/13/2014; petition via NEF Regeneration.); FPD shall advise court by 2/12/2014 re representation of Petitioner or inability to do so. Further ordered Clerk shall send copy this order to CJA Coordinator. ( E-service 1/13/2014.) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 1/13/2014 to reflect copy of order mailed to Mr. Kinford at HDSP on 1/14/2014 (DRM).
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER DENYING # 15 Motion for interaction. FURTHER ORD supplemental brief re # 16 Motion due by 7/20/2013. FURTHER ORD responsive brief due 14 days thereafter. FURTHER ORD GRANTING nunc pro tunc # 19 Motion for extension of time. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDERED Clerk shall FILE and ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (# 1 -1) on the Respondents. (E-service to Attorney General on 2/15/2013) FURTHER ORD Respondents' answer/response due by 4/1/2013. FURTHER ORD henceforth Petitioner shall serve A ttorney General a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of service. FURTHER ORD any state court exhibits shall be filed as specified herein. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall DETACH and FILE Petitioner's (# 1 -2) Motion for counsel. FURTHER ORD Petitioner's Motion for counsel is DENIED. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kinford v. Palmer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Steven M. Kinford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Jack Palmer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
