Titus v. LeGrand et al
Craig M. Titus |
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2013cv00106 |
March 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Robert C. Jones |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER denying 22 motion for appointment of counsel; granting 11 motion to dismiss. The petition is dismissed with prejudice as untimely. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 03/05/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Clerk shall file and electronically serve the 1 Petition on the respondents (service completed 6/18/13). Respondents shall have 45 days to answer, or otherwise respond to, petition. Petitioner's 1 -11 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. Any state court record exhibits filed by Respondents shall be filed with separate index. Hard copy of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to staff attorneys in Reno. Henceforth, Petitioner to serve upon th e NV AG a copy of every pleading, motion, or document submitted for consideration by the court. Petitioner shall include with original paper submitted for filing a certificate of mailing. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 06/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.