Burriola v. Baca
| Anthony Burriola |
| Isidro Baca |
| 3:2013cv00574 |
| October 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 03/06/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER - GRANTING ECF No. 35 Motion for Clarification. Petitioner has until September 7, 2016 to file and serve a reply to respondents' answer (ECF No. 33 ). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 08/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDERED that respondents' # 13 Motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part. Grounds 1 and 2 of the # 8 Second Amended Petition are DISMISSED in full from this action. Grounds 4 and 5 are DISMISSED in part as described above in the text of this order. FURTHER ORD petitioner's # 25 Motion to strike is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORD that respondents' answer due by 11/8/2015; petitioners reply due 45 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Clerk shall add AG as counsel for respondents. Clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents copy of 8 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this order (served via NEF 10/7/14). In addition, clerk shall return to petit ioner copy of second amended petition (mailed 10/7/14). Respondents shall have 45 days to respond to petition. Hard coy of any state court record exhibits shall be forwarded - for this case - to staff attorneys in Las Vegas.. Henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon respondents copy of all pleadings submitted to the court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/6/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing petitioner to file second amended petition within 30 days. Clerk shall send petitioner a petition form with instructions (sent 6/16/14). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/16/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER - The Clerk shall retain the 1 -1 petition but not file it at this time. The Clerk shall send petitioner the approved habeas form and instructions (mailed 10/31/2013). Petitioner to file an amended petition within 30 days (due by 11/30/2013). Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burriola v. Baca | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Isidro Baca | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anthony Burriola | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
