Monroe v. Walker et al
| Ronald Monroe |
| Warden Legrand and C/O Walker |
| 3:2014cv00515 |
| October 6, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 38 ). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/9/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER accepting and adopting ECF No. 35 Report and Recommendation; dismissing without prejudice this action; directing Clerk to close case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER IFP Application 1 is granted. No initial installment fee due. Monthly payments due until full filing fee paid (copy of order sent via NEF to finance and via USPS to NDOC). Clerk shall electronically serve copy of this order a nd complaint 6 on AG's Office. Within 21 days, AG's Office shall file notice re acceptance of service. Henceforth, Plaintiff shall serve upon defendants copy of all documents submitted to the Court. Motion to appear at settlement conference telephonically 7 is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 6/3/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
