Barbour v. Colvin
Danyl W. Barbour |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel |
3:2015cv00380 |
July 22, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Howard D. McKibben |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER that accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31 ); Barbour's motion for attorney's fees (ECF No. 29 ) is granted, $15,000 in attorney's fees is awarded, and Barbour's counsel must reimburse Barbour $2,950. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 23 ORDER - The court hereby ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 20 ). Therefore, plaintiff's motion for remand (ECF No. 11 ) is granted, defendant's cross-motion to affir m (ECF No. 18 ) is denied, and this action is remanded to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 12/20/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 13 ORDER on 12 Stipulation for Extension of Time to file Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm : Motion due by 2/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 1/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.