Peters v. Raymond et al
| Richard W. Peters |
| Isidro Baca, Brooks, Nicki Brooks, Greg Cox, Sheryl Foster, R. Hannah, Sgt. Miller, Raymond and Lisa Walsh |
| 3:2015cv00493 |
| September 25, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
ORDER - Per Order (ECF No. 173 ), this Court has ordered that the video testimony of William Lyons #79249, Richard Johnston, #91380, and Fernando Rodriguez #51052 shall be taken for the jury trial set to begin on April 18, 2022. The Attorn ey General's office shall confer with Plaintiff to determine the date and time the witnesses will testify. The Attorney General's office is directed to make arrangements with Northern Nevada Correctional Center and NSHE for the three inmates to testify by Zoom video conference. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/15/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER - Motion to have Inmate Witness Testify at Trial (ECF No. 165 ) is GRANTED. Motion to have Inmate Witness Testify at Trial (ECF No. 166 ) is GRANTED. Motion to have Inmate Witness Testify at Trial (ECF No. 167 ) is GRANTED . The Court hereby issues writs for habeas corpus ad testificandum to Nevada Department of Corrections to have Mr. William Lyons (Offender ID #79249), Mr. Richard Johnston (Offender ID #91380), and Mr. Fernando Rodriguez (Offender ID #51052) testify via video conference for trial in this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER TO TRANSPORT PLAINTIFF AND ORDER TO TEST NDOC INMATE FOR IN-PERSON COURT PROCEEDINGS for trial to commence 8:30 A.M., Monday, April 18, 2022, in Reno Courtroom Number 3, before Judge Robert C. Jones. Clerk of the Court shall provide a courtesy copy of this Order to the U.S. Marshals Office in Reno, Nevada. (Emailed to Reno USM on 3/10/2022.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/10/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 142 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a Joint Pre-Trial Order no later than June 10, 2021.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further extensions shall be granted. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/22/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER - Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by Friday, 3/12/2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/9/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER - Defendants' Motion to Continue Deadline for Filing Joint Pretrial Order (ECF No. 132 ) is GRANTED. The deadline to file the parties' proposed Joint Pretrial Order is VACATED to be reset at the appropriate time in the future. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ECF No. 118 is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction ECF No. 109 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER granting ECF No. 120 Motion for Enlargement of Time re ECF No. 118 R&R. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER that Defendants' motion for leave to file medical records under seal (ECF No. 89 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (ECF No. 81 ) is DENIED and his Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 101 ) is granted. Plaintiff is afforded until 7/15/2018 to submit his opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 88 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER that ECF No. 76 Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER granting ECF No. 66 Motion for Enlargement of Time to reply to ECF No. 63 Motion for Court to Replace All Documents within Case at State Expense. Reply due by 1/2/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 50 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay and 51 Plaintiff's Motion for Physical and Mental Examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 6/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting Plaintiff's ECF No. 1 IFP application - NDOC to pay Clerk from inmate account (copy of order sent to Finance and NDOC Chief of Inmate Services); denying ECF Nos. 17 , 18 , and 23 motions; directing Clerk to e-s erve NV AG with this order and ECF No. 11 Amended Complaint (NEFs sent 11/18/2016). AG to advise Court within 21 days re service. Answer due within 60 days for any defendants represented. Plaintiff shall serve defendants copy of all pleadings and include certificate of service. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 11/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
