Bank of America, N.A. v. Esplanade at Damonte Ranch Homeowners' Association et al
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| ATC Assessment Collection Group, LLC, Esplanade at Damonte Ranch Homeowners' Association and Thunder Properties, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv00116 |
| March 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting ECF No. 47 Motion to Remove Attorney from Electronic Service List. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/14/2019. (Attorneys Vatana Lay and Steven G. Shevorski, Pvt terminated obo Bank of America, N.A. ) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying ECF No. 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting ECF No. 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. Bank of America shall submit a proposed form of judgment within 14 days of this order's entry. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 05/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting ECF No. 33 Stipulation : Reply to ECF No. 31 Response re ECF No. 29 Motion for summary judgment due by 3/27/2017. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
