Lall v. Baca et al
| James Lall |
| Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2016cv00469 |
| August 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER that this action is dismissed without prejudice; Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability; Clerk directed to enter final judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER that petitioner will have until 9/21/2018 to file a motion as outlined in order; Petitioner's failure to choose any of the three options listed, or seek other appropriate relief from this Court, will result in the dismissal of his f ederal habeas petition; Petitioner is advised to familiarize himself with the limitations periods for filing federal habeas petitions contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), as those limitations periods may have a direct and substantial effect on whatever choice he makes regarding his petition. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER - Respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12 ) is granted in part and denied in part as specified herein. P shall file a motion for partial dismissal, dismissal of entire petition, or other appropriate relief such as stay and abeyance, by 7/26/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting ECF No. 10 Motion to Extend Time to respond to first amended petition. Response/answer due 2/16/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying petitioners motion for appointment of counsel ECF No. 7 ; Clerk to e-serve AG with a copy of the amended petition ECF No. 6 and this order, along with regenerated NEF of the remaining filings (e-served and NEF regenerated o n 10/17/2017); respondents have 60 days to respond to the petition as amended; respondents must file a set of state court record exhibits relevant to the response filed to the petition; all state court record exhibits filed herein must be filed wi th a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number; CM/ECF attachments that are filed further must be identified by the number or numbers of the exhibits in the attachment; counsel additionally must send a hard copy of all exhibits fi led to the Reno Clerks Office; petitioner will have (30) days from service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to mail a reply or response to the Clerk for filing. See order for further details and instructions. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER - IFP motion is granted (ECF No. 1 ). Petitioner's motion for an enlargement of time (ECF No. 4 ) is granted nunc pro tunc. Clerk shall send petitioner the 2254 form with instructions. (Mailed to P 3/3/2017 with instant order.) "First Amended" petition due by 4/2/2017. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/2/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
