Costa v. Baca et al
Petitioner: Jerald Rey Costa, Jr.
Respondent: Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2016cv00705
Filed: December 6, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Howard D. McKibben
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitioner's motions for extension of time to file his reply (ECF Nos. 45 & 46 ) are GRANTED nunc pro tunc to April 20, 2024, and May 15, 2024, respectively. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 2/11/2025. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Costa's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 43 ) is GRANTED. Costa has until May 1, 2024, to file a reply to respondents' answer (ECF No. 31 ). Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/3/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
January 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Costa's motion to stay (ECF No. 36 ) and motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 38 ) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Costa's most recent motion for extension of time (ECF No. [41 ]) is GRANTED. Costa has until April 1, 2024, to file a reply to respondents' answer (ECF No. 31 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Costa's prior motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 39 / 40 ) are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' motion for extension of time to supplement the record (ECF No. 34 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc as of September 5, 2023. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/8/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
August 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDERED that Costa's Motion for instructions (ECF No. 32 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents have 20 days from the date this order is entered (9/5/2023) to either (1) supplement the record with a copy of the transcri pt of the preliminary hearing conducted on July 8, 2010, in Case No. SJC 10-1108 (Sparks Justice Court) or (2) file a notice explaining why they are unable to provide a copy of the transcript. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner has 60 days from the date this order is entered (10/15/2023) to file a reply to respondents' answer (ECF No. 31 ). Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/16/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Ground 1 of the amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 14 ) is dismissed. IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED that respondents have 60 days from the date of this order is entered to file an answer responding to the remaining claims in the amended petition as detailed herein (5/29/2023). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 24 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to November 9, 2022. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER - The respondents' first and second motions for enlargement of time to file a response to the petition (ECF Nos. 17 & 18 ) are granted nunc pro tunc to August 8, 2022, and September 7, 2022, respectively. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/9/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting 9 Motion to reopen. The stay in this case is lifted. The Clerk is directed to administratively REOPEN the case (Case reopened). Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date this order is entered within which to file an amended habeas petition if he wishes to do so (6/20/2022). Further briefing detailed herein.Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 5/19/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJD)
January 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER directing Clerk to file petition and e-serve it on Respondents (NV AG added, NEF sent 1/24/2017); staying this action pending final resolution of state post-conviction proceedings; directing Clerk to administratively close this ac tion - Petitioner to file motion to reopen within 30 days of issuance of remittitur; denying without prejudice Petitioner's ECF No. 6 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Costa v. Baca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Isidro Baca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerald Rey Costa, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?