Hill v. Filson et al
| Joaquin Broushon Hill |
| Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2016cv00743 |
| December 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER - Clerk shall close case number 3:16-cv-00743-MMD-VPC as duplicative. (Instant case closed.) Petitioner shall file any future documents in case number 3:16-cv-00694 only. Clerk shall file the IFP application that was docketed in case number 3:16-cv-00743-MMD-VPC into case number 3:16-cv-00694 as ECF No. 5. The briefing schedule set forth below applies to case number 3:16-cv-00694. Petitioner's second IFP application (ECF No. 5 in case 3:16-cv-00694 ) is granted. Cl erk file and e-serve the petition (ECF No.1-1 in case 3:16-cv-00694) on the respondents. (E-service 1/6/2017.) Clerk shall add AG as counsel for respondents. Answer/response to petition due by 4/6/2017. Reply/opposition to answer due 45 days fro m service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response. Any additional state court record exhibits filed must be filed with a separate index of exhibits as specified herein. The parties must send courtesy copies of all exhibits in this case tor Reno "Staff Attorney". Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
