Cedeno v. Filson et al
| Devin Cedeno |
| Filson and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2017cv00036 |
| January 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice because it is untimely; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close this action; a certificate of appealability will not issue; and petitioner's request for a status check is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that the Clerk is directed to file the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254; petitioner shall have until 09/13/2017 to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this action as untimely; the Clerk is d irected to add AG as counsel for respondents and serve respondents with order and the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (e-served on 08/14/2017); respondents counsel shall enter a notice of appearance by 09/03/2017, but no further response shall be required from respondents until further order of the Court. (copy of Petition sent to P). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 08/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
