Foster v. Baca et al
Petitioner: John Michael Foster
Respondent: Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2017cv00317
Filed: May 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Miranda M. Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that Respondents' motion to dismiss ECF No. 18 is granted; Respondents' first and second motions for extension of time to file a response to the amended petition ECF Nos. 16 and 17 are both granted nunc pro tunc; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
April 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER - Clerk directed to electronically serve the first amended petition (ECF No. 12 ) on the respondents and add NV AG as counsel; respondents must file a response to the petition by 7/5/2018; petitioner will have 45 days from service of t he answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition; any additional state court record exhibits filed herein; the parties must send courtesy copies of all exhibits in this case to Reno Staff Attorney; petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 13 ) is denied. See Order for further details and instructions. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
January 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER that Clerk detach and file the petition ECF No. 1 -1; petition is dismissed with leave to amend; Clerk directed to send to petitioner (1) copy of form § 2254 habeas petition, information and instructions, and the papers petitioner has file d in this action (mailed forms and ECF Nos. 1 , 1 -1, 3 , 4 , 5 and 8 on 01/17/2018); petitioner is expressly advised that failure to file an amended petition will result in the dismissal of this action. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
January 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER -Clerk shall resend this Court's order (ECF No. 6 ) to petitioner at his new address of record. (Mailed to P 1/5/2018.) Payment of $5.00 filing fee due by 2/3/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foster v. Baca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Isidro Baca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Michael Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?