Fields v. Dzurenda
Petitioner: Kevin Fields
Respondent: James Dzurenda
Case Number: 3:2017cv00691
Filed: November 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Miranda M. Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER dismissing with prejudice this action; denying a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER that Respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10 ) is granted; Respondents' answer to the remaining grounds for relief in Field's petition (ECF No. 7 ) is due by 3/23/2019; Petitioner will have 30 days following s ervice of Respondents' answer in which to file a reply; Respondents' motion to strike (ECF No. 16 ) is granted; Petitioner's motion in support to opposition (ECF No. 15 ) is stricken. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
May 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that petitioners application to proceed in forma pauperis ECF No. 5 is denied as moot; Clerk directed to file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus ECF No. 1 -1, add AG, as counsel for respondents and electronically serve upon res pondents a copy of the petition and this order (e-served on 05/03/2018); petitioner to submit a new first page of the petition by 05/16/2018; respondents will have until 08/01/2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the petition; any pro cedural defenses raised by respondents to be raised together in a single consolidated motion to dismiss; petitioner will have (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply; any exhibits filed by the parties must be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number; hard copy of all exhibits must be forwarded to the staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
April 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that petitioner submit $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis by 05/06/2018; failure to do so may result in the dismissal of action without prejudice; Clerk directed to send petitioner (1) copy of the IFP form by a prisoner with instructions (mailed to p on 04/06/2018). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fields v. Dzurenda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Dzurenda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?