Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC v. Foster
| Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC |
| James F. Foster |
| 3:2018cv00032 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER - Wells Fargo's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 8 ) is denied as moot. Wells Fargo's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 12 ) is denied. Defendant's Mot ion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss Action (ECF No. 17 ) is denied. This action is stayed in its entirety pending resolution of the separate arbitration proceeding before FINRA. Upon resolution of that proceeding, the parties must f ile a joint status report within seven (7) days informing this Court of the effect of the arbitration upon the claims in this case. The Clerk shall administratively close this case.Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting ECF No. 5 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Kevin K. Fitzgerald for Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC, and approving Designation of Local Counsel. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
