Mendoza Hernandez v. Bondars Logistics, LLC
Jaime Mendoza Hernandez |
Bondars Logistics, LLC |
3:2018cv00427 |
September 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
William G Cobb |
Robert C Jones |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Joint CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT by Defendant Bondars Logistics, LLC (Moore, Christian) |
Filing 6 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER : A case management conference is set for Wednesday, November 7, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Reno Courtroom 2 before United States Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. Counsel wishing to appear telephonically shall dial 1-877-873-8017, enter the access code 3416460, and enter the security code 11718 approximately five (5) minutes prior to the hearing. The parties shall jointly file the case management report with the Clerk of the Court not less than seven (7) court days before the case management conference. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Bondars Logistics, LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Moore, Christian) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Answer to Complaint filed by Bondars Logistics, LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/17/2018.(Moore, Christian) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaime Mendoza Hernandez. Bondars Logistics, LLC served on 9/11/2018, answer due 10/2/2018. (Brazelton, Steven) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bondars Logistics, LLC. (DRM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bondars Logistics, LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5225161) by Jaime Mendoza Hernandez. Proof of service due by 12/3/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Brazelton, Steven) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mendoza Hernandez v. Bondars Logistics, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bondars Logistics, LLC | |
Represented By: | Christian L. Moore |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jaime Mendoza Hernandez | |
Represented By: | Steven Brazelton |
Represented By: | Nathalie Huynh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.