Stephenson et al v. Hollingshead et al
Kelly Stephenson and Christine Stephenson |
Gardner Trucking, Inc. and Joseph Hollingshead |
3:2019cv00052 |
January 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin Carry |
Larry R Hicks |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Gardner Trucking, Inc., Joseph Hollingshead that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent CRST, Inc. for Gardner Trucking, Inc. added. (Lowry, Michael) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from 9th Judicial District Court, Case Number 18-cv-0263, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5413168) by Gardner Trucking, Inc., Joseph Hollingshead. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Answer, #4 Jury Demand, #5 Arbitration Petition, #6 Order on Arbitration Petition, #7 Order to Appear for Calendar Call, #8 Rule 41 Dismissal of Nevada Entity)(Lowry, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.