King v. Filson et al
| Matthew J. King |
| Nevada Attorney General and Filson |
| 3:2019cv00109 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Larry R Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 4/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 3
ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; a certificate of appealabiliy is DENIED; the Clerk shall send petitioner two copies each of an application form to proceed in forma pauperis for inmates with instructions and a noncapital Section 2254 habeas petition form with instructions (Mailed to P on 4/16/2019); the Clerk shall enter judgment and close this action. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Filson, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00109-LRH-WGC. (LH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE: No Application to Proceed I.F.P. or Filing Fee was received with Petition, by Matthew J. King. (Attachments: #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion for Counsel, #3 Affidavit)(LH) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
