Duda v. Bacca et al
Chet Duda |
D. Richard, Lisa Walsh and Isidro Bacca |
3:2019cv00546 |
August 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin Carry |
Miranda M Du |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Plaintiff Chet Duda. (KR) |
Filing 4 ORDER that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners (ECF No. #1 ) is DENIED as moot; the Clerk shall send Plaintiff the approved application to proceed in forma pauperisby a non-prisoner and instructions (Mailed to P on 9/20/2019); Fully complete IFP application or $400 filing fee due by 10/20/2019; if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, dismissal of this action may result; the Clerk shall retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1), but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 9/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address, by Plaintiff Chet Duda. Old: 1107359, NNCC. New: 790 Shangri-La Dr, Reno, NV 89509. (KR) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KR) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. (WJ) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Chet Duda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint) (KR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.