Sloane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Heather Sloane |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 3:2019cv00648 |
| October 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to #9 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Pintar, Michael) |
Filing 17
ORDER granting ECF No. #16 Stipulation : Reply to ECF No. #15 Response re ECF No. #9 Motion to Dismiss due by 12/9/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 12/4/2019 to correct hyperlink (DRM).
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting ECF No. #13 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. #9 Motion to Dismiss due by 12/2/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Reply re #9 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Pintar, Michael) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to #9 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Heather Sloane. Replies due by 12/2/2019. (Rose, Sean) |
| Filing 14 2nd CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #13 . Attorney Thomas R. Brennan is advised to review and update his user account information. (no image attached) (LE) |
| Filing 13 Second STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) re #9 Motion to Dismiss, #12 Order on Stipulation, by Plaintiff Heather Sloane. (Rose, Sean) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting ECF No. #11 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. #9 Motion to Dismiss due by Monday 11/25/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #9 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Heather Sloane. (Rose, Sean) |
| Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Heather Sloane. (Rose, Sean) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Responses due by 11/18/2019. (Pintar, Michael) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Pintar, Michael) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Heather Sloane. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Rose, Sean) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/25/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 11/9/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #1 -2. Attorney Thomas R. Brennan is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (LE) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (LE) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Pintar, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Pintar, Michael) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District Court, Case Number CV19-01812, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5751217) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pintar, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sloane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Pintar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Heather Sloane | |
| Represented By: | Sean P. Rose |
| Represented By: | Thomas R Brennan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
