Cole v. Bryant et al
| David Cole |
| Escavili and Bryant |
| 3:2020cv00160 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Cole. (AB) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Clerk will send Plaintiff the approved IFP Application and the information and instructions for the same (Mailed to Plaintiff at ESP on 3/17/2020).Within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff must either file a fully complete IFP Application or pay the full $400 filing fee. If Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, dismissal of this action may result. Clerk will retain the Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (AB) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Financial Certificate) (AB) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
