Brady v. Estill et al
| Anthony Micheal Brady |
| Vasquez, Benjamin Estill, Ruiz, Binder and McKenzie |
| 3:2020cv00174 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Robert C Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony Micheal Brady. NOTE: ECF No. [1-2] contains Plaintiff's Financial Certificate and Inmate Account Statement (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (DRM) Modified on 4/3/2020 (PR). |
Filing 3
ORDER - Clerk WILL SEND P approved IFP application and instructions. (Mailed to P at ESP on 3/20/2020.) Fully complete IFP or $400 filing fee due within 60 days of this order (5/19/2020). Clerk shall retain the complaint but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (LW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE : No IFP Application, or Filing Fee was received with Initiating Documents filed by Anthony Micheal Brady. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Financial Certificate) (LW) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
