Brooks v. Dixon et al
| Anthony Brooks |
| Gettere, Arthur Dixon and Nevada Department of Corrections, Director |
| 3:2020cv00314 |
| May 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Richard F Boulware |
| William G Cobb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff the approved IFP form by an inmate and instructions (Attached hereto for distribution to P); giving Plaintiff until 7/27/2020 to file a fully complete IFP application or pay the $400 filing fee; if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice; the Clerk will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1), but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Inmate Packet)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Financial Certificate) (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
