White v. Raley's
Angela White |
Raley's |
3:2020cv00457 |
August 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
William G Cobb |
Miranda M Du |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of FRCP 26(f) meeting by Angela White. (Nomura, Don) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to #6 Motion by Plaintiff Angela White. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 7) (Nomura, Don) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to #6 Motion by Defendant Raley's. Replies due by 9/13/2020. (Balanovsky, Lawrence) |
Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Angela White. (Nomura, Don) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Angela White. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Nomura, Don) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Angela White. Responses due by 9/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Nomura, Don) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Raley's. (Balanovsky, Lawrence) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Raley's. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Balanovsky, Lawrence) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/7/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/22/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 9/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Washoe County District Court, Case Number CV19-02149, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6114337) by Raley's. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit) (Kuhls, Timothy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: White v. Raley's | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Angela White | |
Represented By: | Don Nomura |
Represented By: | Jerry H Mowbray |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Raley's | |
Represented By: | Timothy David Kuhls |
Represented By: | Lawrence Balanovsky |
Represented By: | Robert K. Phillips |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.