Iden v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Richard Iden |
Wells Fargo Bank and Karen Winckler |
3:2020cv00503 |
September 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
William G Cobb |
Robert C Jones |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER - Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of the instructions and application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate (Attached hereto for distribution to Plaintiff by ESP). Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a completed IFP Application, pay the filing fee, or notify the Court that he does not wish to pursue this action further. If he fails to timely do so, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Discovery, by Plaintiff Richard Iden. Responses due by 11/11/2020. (DRM) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (LW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE: No IFP Application, or Filing Fee was received with Initiating Documents filed by Plaintiff Richard Iden. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Financial Certificate) (LW) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.