Hopkins v. Saul
Susan Hopkins |
Andrew Saul |
Solicitor General of the United States |
3:2020cv00625 |
November 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Allison Jaime Cheung on behalf of Defendant Andrew Saul. (Cheung, Allison) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Susan Hopkins re #1 Complaint,,,. Andrew Saul served on 11/20/2020. (Kalagian, Marc) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to USA. (DRM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AF) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Susan Hopkins. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6248908) by Susan Hopkins. Proof of service due by 2/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Kalagian, Marc) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 12/9/2020 (AF). |
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.