Tutt v. State of Nevada
| Evans Tutt |
| Nevada, State of, Nevada Attorney General and Perry Russell |
| 3:2020cv00722 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #6 ) is denied. Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee by March 29, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner two copies of this order. (2 copies attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC law library.) Petitioner must make the necessary arrangements to have a copy of this order attached to the check for the filing fee. Initial screening, and consideration of other motions deferred until full compliance with this order. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 2nd Copy of Order for Plaintiff via NNCC law library)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, by Petitioner Evans Tutt. (KR) |
| Filing 7 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner Evans Tutt. (KR) |
| Filing 6 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Petitioner Evans Tutt. (KR) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #4 ) is denied without prejudice. Clerk is directed to send Tutt two blank copies of (1) the in forma pauperis application for incarcerated individuals, and (2) the form Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (attached hereto for distribution to Petitioner by NNCC). Petitioner must file a complete IFP application or pay the $5 filing fee by March 1, 2021. Petitioner must file an Amended Petition on the Court's form by March 1, 2021. The initial screening of the Petition under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts and consideration of the Motion to Stay Habeas Petition (ECF No. #1 -2) and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #1 -3) are deferred to until such time as he has fully complied with this order. Petitioner's failure to comply with this Order by the March 1, 2021 deadline will result in the dismissal of the Petition without prejudice and without further advance notice. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #3 2254 Habeas Petition, #4 2254 Habeas Petition) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Evans Tutt. (DRM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:20-cv-00722-MMD-CLB. (AB) |
|
Filing 2
GENERAL ORDER - Fifth Amended General Order 2012-01 re Mandatory E-Filing for Cases by Inmates at NNCC, LCC, ESP, and HDSP (AB)
|
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Motion to Stay Habeas Petition, #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #4 Envelope) (AB) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
