Cox v. Lightning Auctions, Inc.,
| Alden Timothy Cox |
| Lightning Auctions, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00424 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Alden Timothy Cox. Lightning Auctions, Inc. waiver sent on 9/24/2021, answer due 11/23/2021. (Maguire, Oliver)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting ECF No. #4 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and approving Designation of Local Counsel Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/22/2021. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Oliver Peter Maguire and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Stephen K. Christiansen (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-6639245) by Plaintiff Alden Timothy Cox. ( Christiansen, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE Form AO 121 (REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION OR APPEAL REGARDING A COPYRIGHT) by Alden Timothy Cox re #1 Complaint,. ( Christiansen, Stephen)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (LE)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Alden Timothy Cox. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case ( Christiansen, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Lightning Auctions, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6638813) by Alden Timothy Cox. Proof of service due by 12/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) ( Christiansen, Stephen) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox v. Lightning Auctions, Inc., | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alden Timothy Cox | |
| Represented By: | Stephen K. Christiansen |
| Represented By: | Oliver Peter Maguire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lightning Auctions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Mark D Wray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
