Bacharach v. Reubart et al
| Joshua William Bacharach |
| Reubart, Charles Daniels and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2022cv00122 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Anne R Traum |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Joshua William Bacharach. (Filed and GRANTED per ECF No. #6 Order.) (DRM)
|
|
Filing 7
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Joshua William Bacharach. (Filed pursuant to ECF No. #6 Order. E-service to AG, FPD.) (DRM)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the Petition (ECF No. #1 -1), and the motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. #1 -2). Clerk shall add AG as counsel for Rs, e-serve the Petition and a copy of this order on the respondents, and an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notices of Electronic Filing. (E-service to AG on 5/5/2022; NEFs # 1-5 regenerated to AG on 5/5/2022.) Rs counsel must enter a notice of appearance within 21 days of entry of this order (5/26/2022). The motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2) is granted. Clerk shall e-serve the Federal Public Defender a copy of this order and the Petition (ECF No. #1 -1). The FPD is provisionally appointed as counsel and will have 30 days (6/4/2022) to undertake representation, or file notice otherwise. Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to Bacharach (e-service via ESP on 5/5/2022). and the CJA Coordinator (ad hoc email on 5/5/2022). Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 5/5/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing 5
RECEIPT of Payment: $ 5.00, receipt number NVLAS080771 (CJD)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S NOTICE that in order to create a caseload for U.S. District Judge Anne R. Traum, this case is reassigned to Judge Anne R. Traum for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:22-cv-00122-ART-CSD. (no image attached) (CJD)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDERED that Bacharach's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is denied without prejudice. Bacharach must file another application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account. In the alternative, petitioner must make the necessary arrangements to pay the filing fee of $5.00, accompanied by a copy of this order. Petitioner will have 45 days from the date that this order is entered (5/22/2022) to comply. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Bacharach a blank application form for incarcerated litigants. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE from USDC advising case against Reubart, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00122. (DRM)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Joshua William Bacharach. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC, #2 Motion for Counsel) (DRM)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
