Bourne v. Rookies Inc.
| Chad Bourne |
| Rookies Inc. and Rookies Inc. doing business as Rookie's Sports Bar and Grill |
| 3:2022cv00521 |
| November 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 EXHIBIT 1 to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Chad Bourne. (Burke, Steven) |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rookies Inc. (HKL) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin (ENE). (HKL) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (HKL) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Chad Bourne. (Burke, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Chad Bourne. (Burke, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rookies Inc. (Filing fee $402 - Receipt No. ANVDC-7127267) by Chad Bourne. Proof of service due by 3/13/2023. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
