Ruiz v. Dokiwari
| Carlos Ruiz |
| D. Dokiwari and Nevada Dept. of Corrections |
| 3:2023cv00187 |
| May 4, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Action, by Plaintiff Carlos Ruiz. (DRM) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Pursuant to #4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (DRM) Modified on 6/14/2023 - Re-NEF (CJS). |
Filing 3
ORDER - $402 filing fee, or fully complete IFP application, due by 7/14/2023. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order this action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice. Clerk is directed to send P approved IFP application form w instructions (IFP form and instr attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC law library) and retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1) but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 5/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
