Maestas v. Gittere et al
| Mr. Beau Maestas |
| Warden Gittere, William Reubart and J Verde |
| 3:2023cv00330 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Beau Maestas. (DRM) |
Filing 3
ORDER - IFP Application (ECF No. #1 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has until Monday, September 18, 2023, to either pay the full filing fee or file a fully complete IFP Application. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff the approved IFP application and instructions and retain the complaint and exhibits (ECF No. #1 -1) but not file them at this time. (IFP Attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP Law Library). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 7/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Inmate IFP and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (GA) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Beau Maestas. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(GA) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (GA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
