Rodriguez v. Henley et al
| Jeffrey Rodriguez |
| John Henley and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
| 3:2024cv00182 |
| April 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Deputy Attorney General on behalf of Respondents John Henley, The Attorney General of the State of Nevada. Deputy Attorney General Michael Bongard terminated. (Healer, Leslie) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Deputy Attorney General on behalf of Respondents John Henley, The Attorney General of the State of Nevada. Deputy Attorney General Aaron D. Ford-AG terminated. (Bongard, Michael) |
| Filing 7 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Jeffrey Rodriguez. (Filed pursuant to #6 Order; e-service to AG.) (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4) (DRM) |
Filing 6
ORDER #3 IFP application is granted. Clerk shall file the Petition (ECF Nos. #1 -1, #1 -2, #1 - 3, #1 -4). Clerk shall add AG as counsel for Respondents. And electronically serve AG a copy of the Petition (ECF No. #1 -1, #1 -2, #1 -3, #1 -4), this Order, and all other items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notices of Electronic Filing (E-service 4/29/2024; Petition upon subsequent filing; NEFs #1-5 regenerated to AG on 4/29/2024.). Respondents' counsel shall (1) enter a notice of appearance within 21 days of entry of this order (5/20/2024); and (2) file a response to the Petition within 90 days (7/28/2024). (See pdf order for additional specifics.) Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/26/2024. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Jeffrey Rodriguez. (DLS) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/24/2024. Petitioner Jeffrey Rodriguez with Inmate Number 88017 is an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) and is housed at Northern Nevada Correctional Center. Petitioner has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis to the court. Petitioner authorizes the NDOC to provide a copy of their trust fund account statement for activity covering the last six months to this court. The NDOC is ORDERED to file directly with the court the following documents pertaining to Petitioner Jeffrey Rodriguez: (a) current account balance, (b) average monthly account balance, and (c) average monthly deposits for the last six months by email to #docketreno@nvd.uscourts.gov. A copy of this order has been electronically sent to NDOC. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Jeffrey Rodriguez. (DLS) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Henley, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:24-cv-00182-MMD-CLB. (For Distribution by law library.) (DLS) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC - Part 1, #2 Part 2, #3 Part 3, #4 Part 4) (DLS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (DLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
