Anderson v. Dzurenda et al
| Jayon Anderson |
| Clark, D. Southworth, Ferro, Remairez, Forshee, Marks, Kenith L. Williams, Horton, Paul Parks, Itchberry, David Stevens, MayCay, Wilcox, Tim Garrett, Kara LeGrand, James E. Dzurenda and Erin Parks |
| 3:2024cv00454 |
| October 3, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Anne R Traum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE. Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case and send Plaintiff a courtesy copy of the documents filed at ECF Nos. #1 , #1 -1, and #1 -2. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 10/24/2024. (For Distribution by law library.) (Attachments: #1 Copy of docs filed at ECF No. 1, 1-1, 1-2)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Error by Jayon Anderson. (DLS) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (For Distribution by law library.) (DLS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jayon Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(DLS) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/3/2024: #2 Motion for PI/TRO) (DLS). |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
