LaFauci v. NH Adult Parole Board, Executive et al
Anthony LaFauci |
NH Adult Parole Board, Executive Assistant, NH State Prison, Warden and NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner |
1:2008cv00077 |
March 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Merrimack |
Paul J. Barbadoro |
James R. Muirhead |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER denying 37 Motion for Leave to File Second Writ of Habeas Corpus.. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (mxm) |
Filing 36 ORDER denying 35 Motion for Writ for Habeas Corpus. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (mxm) |
Filing 34 ORDER denying 33 Motion for Leave to File. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (mm) |
Filing 29 ///ORDER granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (jna) Modified on 8/14/2009 to add: ///(vln). |
Filing 20 ///ORDER approving 17 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (mm) |
Filing 18 ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (mm) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting 9 (addendum)/Motion to the Courts Issued Order Dated April 17, 2008 to Clarified Filed Petitioner - federal proceedings will remain stayed and the petition held in abeyance pending his complete exhaustion of state remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (jab) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.