Jakobiec V. Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Co.
Plaintiff: Thaddeus J. Jakobiec
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Co.
Case Number: 1:2010cv00223
Filed: June 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Presiding Judge: Paul J. Barbadoro
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ///ORDER denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(jna)
May 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying without prejudice 21 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (jna)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jakobiec V. Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thaddeus J. Jakobiec
Represented By: Steven M. Latici
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?