Bourne v. Arruda
Plaintiff: Samuel J. Bourne
Defendant: John R. Arruda, Jr.
Case Number: 1:2010cv00393
Filed: September 9, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Presiding Judge: Steven J. McAuliffe
Presiding Judge: Landya B. McCafferty
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 190 ///ORDER granting 154 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 177 Motion in Limine to Limit Evidence Regarding Special Damages; denying as moot 178 Motion in Limine Regarding Reputational Damages; denying as moot [17 9] Motion in Limine to Exclude Hearsay Evidence; denying as moot 187 Motion in Limine to Exclude Defendants' Exhibits; denying as moot 188 Motion in Limine to Exclude in Part, Defendants' Request for Voir Dire; denying as moot 189 to Exclude Defendants' Request for Jury Instructions. Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER denying 143 Motion for Sanctions; denying 144 Motion to Continue Discovery Period; and granting Bourne's request to lift the filing restriction originally imposed by the July 16, 2012, Order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
August 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER re: 142 Motion to Compel. The court finds that to facilitate its consideration of the motion to compel, King must submit for in camera review, within ten (10) days of the date of this order, complete paper copies of th e documents identified as RDK007-RDK008, without redacting the contents that King claims to be irrelevant. The clerk is directed to file the documents upon receipt as sealed at Level II, subject to further order of this court, pursuant to Local Rule 83.11. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER denying 137 Motion for Contempt. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
August 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER denying 132 Motion to Strike. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
July 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 121 Motion for Contempt and Entry of Default Judgment. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
June 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 119 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER granting 89 Motion to Compel, with respect to Interrogatory No. 15. Plaintiff shall serve upon defendants a complete response to defendants Interrogatory No. 15, and shall either produce the requested do cuments or identify any responsive documents already within defendants possession, within 14 days of the date of this Supplemental Order. Failure to comply with this order, without a showing of good cause, may result in the imposition of sanctions, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER denying 82 Motion to Compel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
April 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER striking 100 Notice of Compliance with Court Order dated 4/2/2012. Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P 5(d)(1) disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) must not be filed with the court until they are used in the proceeding or the court orders the filing. It is herewith ordered that the document is stricken and removed from the docket. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)
April 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER re: 82 Motion to Compel. To facilitate the courts review of the motion, the court directs defendants to submit for in camera review the documents listed in the privilege log within ten days of the date of this order. A long with the submission, defendants shall file a motion to seal those documents for in camera review at Level II, pursuant to Local Rule 83.11(c). Defendants shall also file an affidavit of counsel identifying the relationship between the Town of Madison, counsel, and each person listed in the privilege log as to each document. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER denying 71 Motion to Amend 67 Order on Motion for Reconsideration; granting 75 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Order Dated August 4, 2011. Clerk is directed to docket the reply memorandum (75-1) as filed upon this date. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
September 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER denying without prejudice 66 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)
August 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration Re: 55 Order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (gla)
June 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ///AMENDED ORDER denying as moot 23 Discovery Plan; denying as moot 24 Discovery Plan; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss; denying 32 Motion to Strike; granting 50 Motion for Leave to File. The clerk is directed to docket the supplemental pleading (doc. no. 50-1) as filed upon the date of this Order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (gla)
June 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ///ORDER denying as moot 23 Discovery Plan; denying as moot 24 Discovery Plan; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss; denying 32 Motion to Strike; granting 50 Motion for Leave to File. Bourne shall file the supplement to the amended complaint within ten days. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (gla)
November 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER denying as moot 19 Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum; denying without prejudice 4 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Stay and a Continuance; denying without prejudice 12 Motion for Leave to File Surreply. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (ko)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bourne v. Arruda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John R. Arruda, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel J. Bourne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?