W. B. v. MWV Healthcare Assoc., Inc. et al
| Doreen W.B. |
| Memorial Hospital, M. Angus Badger, Rita Kostecke and MWV Healthcare Assoc., Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00036 |
| January 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER re 40 Motion for David P. Slawsky to Withdraw as Attorney; granting 41 Emergency Motion for Daniel R. Sonneborn and Alan B. Rindler to Withdraw as Attorney. Case stayed for 45 days pending plaintiff's response as outlined. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER re 42 Supplemental Motion for David P. Slawsky to Withdraw as Attorney. Plaintiff to file pro se response as outlined on or before May 15, 2013. Case removed from the July trial calendar. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 29 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff's Medical Expenses Not Paid by Plaintiff or Any Other Source; granting 30 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence, Testimony or Other Matters Relative to Neuropsychological Injury. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
|
Filing
26
PROCEDURAL ORDER re Pretrial Conference scheduled for August 22, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. before Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
