Ortiz v. NH State Prison, Warden
| Hector Ortiz |
| NH State Prison, Warden |
| NH Attorney General - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2012cv00372 |
| October 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
///ORDER approving 26 Report and Recommendation, denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1) and granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER approving 19 Report and Recommendation, granting 16 Motion to amend the § 2254 petition to drop unexhausted claims. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting leave for Petitioner, Mr. Ortiz to file in this court: A)An amended § 2254 petition or B) a Motion to Stay re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Failure to Comply within thirty days of the date of this order may result in a recommendation that Petition be dismissed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Notice of Compliance deadline set for 3/4/13.(cmp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
