Marbury v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Medical Department et al
Raymond G. Marbury |
Strafford County Department of Corrections, Medical Department, Raymond Bower and Tracy Warren |
1:2012fp00339 |
October 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Joseph N. Laplante |
Landya B. McCafferty |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ///ORDER approving 26 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(dae) |
Filing 25 ORDER denying without prejudice 10 Motion to Appoint Medical Expert; denying without prejudice 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying without prejudice 15 Motion for Court Transcript of 4/26/12 sentencing; denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Compel Discovery - Medical Records from Strafford County Medical Dept. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae) |
Filing 17 ORDER Prohibiting Remote Electronic Access to 14 Addendum/BOP Health Services Clinical Encounter. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Financial Affidavit and Prisoner Consent Form filed by Raymond G. Marbury, initial fee of $5.50. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.Finance Follow Up Deadline 12/17/2012(jeb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.