Mateo v. FCI Berlin, Warden
| William Mateo |
| FCI Berlin, Warden |
| 1:2020cv01012 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Paul J Barbadoro |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Objection to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 filed by FCI Berlin, Warden. (Aframe, Seth) |
| Filing 9 Objection to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 filed by FCI Berlin, Warden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Phase 9 Memo, #2 Exhibit Phase 9.5 Memo, #3 Exhibit Phase 10 Memo)(Aframe, Seth) |
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Motion to Extend Time to Object/Respond to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 to November 6, 2020. Text of Order: Granted. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(js)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to Object/Respond to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,, to November 6, 2020 filed by FCI Berlin, Warden.Follow up on Objection on 11/12/2020. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Aframe, Seth) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Seth R. Aframe on behalf of FCI Berlin, Warden Attorney Seth R. Aframe added to party FCI Berlin, Warden(pty:res).(Aframe, Seth) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Motion for Supplemental Brief for Motion Pursuant to 28 USC 2241. Text of Order: Petitioner William Mateo's motion (Doc. No. 6) seeking leave to file a brief supplementing his 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED, and the court will construe Document No. 6 as an addendum to Document No. 1 for all purposes. The respondent has been directed to file a response to Mr. Mateo's request for preliminary relief by October 30, 2020. If possible, the respondent should consider the assertions in Document No. 6 in filing his response. If more time is required to respond to Document No. 6, the respondent may file a motion seeking such additional time as is necessary. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(js)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Supplemental Brief for Motion Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 filed by William Mateo.Follow up on Objection on 11/6/2020. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(js) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE on US Attorney General re: Clerk Service. (js) |
| Filing Fee paid: $ 5 (Check), receipt number 14649019812 by William Mateo re: #2 Filing Fee Omitted Notice. (ed) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT re: #3 Order Directing Service (js) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(js)
|
| SERVICE BY CLERK: Copies mailed via certified mail, return receipt requested to FCI Berlin, Warden & US Attorney General per #3 Order Directing Service.(js) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, Certificate of Custodial Institution. Compliance Deadline set for 12/4/2020. (mc) |
| Filing 1 Defendant's Pro Se Motion for: Relief from Confinement In Light of COVID-19 Health Emergency: Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 filed by William Mateo. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter and Envelope, #2 Exhibits to Petition) (mc) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge. (mc) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. The case designation is: 1:20-cv-1012-PB. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mateo v. FCI Berlin, Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Mateo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
