USA v. Irving Oil Terminals, Inc.
| USA |
| Irving Oil Terminals, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00663 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Steven J McAuliffe |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Assented to Motion to Extend Time to Answer re #1 Complaint - New Case. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. Answer Follow Up on 12/9/2021. (lw)
|
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement by Irving Oil Terminals, Inc. disclosing a parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Upton, John) |
| Filing 4 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer filed by Irving Oil Terminals, Inc.. Attorney John S. Upton added to party Irving Oil Terminals, Inc.(pty:dft).(Upton, John) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Irving Oil Terminals, Inc. by USA. Served/Mailed on 8/11/2021. Answer Follow Up on 10/13/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Shashy, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Lawsuit/Waiver issued electronically as to Irving Oil Terminals, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the notice/waiver and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF) (mc) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-663-SM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT (No fee paid, USA or IFP) filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Waiver)(Shashy, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. Irving Oil Terminals, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USA | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Shashy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Irving Oil Terminals, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John S. Upton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
