Farmer v. USA
| Anthony Farmer |
| USA |
| 1:2022cv00203 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Landya B McCafferty |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ENDORSED ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Text of Order: Anthony Farmer, an indigent incarcerated man, petitions to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. He asks the court to appoint counsel to represent him in this matter. Doc. no. 2. As grounds, he states that he pleaded guilty to a count of using a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 924(c) and that the predicate crime is no longer a crime of violence under Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021). The court does not find that the interests of justice require appointing counsel at this time. See18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B) (standard for appointment of a counsel for a financially eligible person seeking relief under 2255 is if the interests of justice so require). Doc. no. 2 is denied. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de)
|
| Filing 3 AMENDED MOTION to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255 re #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255 filed by Anthony Farmer. Related document: #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255 filed by Anthony Farmer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(de) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. The case designation is: 1:22-cv-203-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(mc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Anthony Farmer.(mc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate Sentence under 28 USC 2255 filed by Anthony Farmer. Notice of Filing to US Attorney with copy of the motion. See also Criminal Case No. 1:17-cr-153-LM-01. (mc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Farmer v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anthony Farmer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
