Maragh v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Marcus Maragh |
FCI Berlin, Warden |
1:2022cv00566 |
December 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Samantha D Elliott |
Andrea K Johnstone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with #10 Order, Endorsed Order. Signed by Daniel J. Lynch, Clerk of Court. (Case Closed) (kad) |
ENDORSED ORDER. Text of Order: On January 20, 2023, the Court issued an order in this case directing that the petitioner be immediately released from the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). As the petitioner has now been released from BOP custody, the petition in this case is dismissed as moot. See Ford v. Bender, 768 F.3d 15, 29 (1st Cir. 2014) ("A prisoner's challenge to prison conditions or policies is generally rendered moot by his transfer or release."). The Clerk's office is directed to close this case and enter judgment. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone.(kad) |
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion for Summary Judgment. Text of Order: Denied as moot. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone.(kad) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. SHOW CAUSE HEARING held on 1/20/2023. The parties consented to the assignment of this case to the magistrate judge. Evidence introduced. The court ordered petitioner immediately released from BOP custody to begin his term of supervised release. (Court Reporter: Liza Dubois) (Pltfs Atty: Marcus Maragh) (Defts Atty: Heather Cherniske)(Total Hearing Time: 13 min.) (kad) |
![]() |
Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes including trial. (vln) |
![]() |
Notice regarding #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this motion has been referred to Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone for proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to its disposition. Any such findings and recommendations shall be filed with the Court and a copy shall forthwith be served on all parties. (vln) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE Regarding Summary Judgment. (vln) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FCI Berlin, Warden. Attorney Heather A Cherniske added to party FCI Berlin, Warden(pty:res).Follow up on Objection on 2/13/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, #2 Exhibit A-Rouleau declaration, #3 Attachment to Exhibit 1-Sentence Computation, #4 Attachment to Exhibit 2-Admission Release History, #5 Attachment to Exhibit 3-Detainer, #6 Attachment to Exhibit 4-Program Statement 5410.01)(Cherniske, Heather) |
Filing Fee paid: $ 5 (Credit Card), receipt number 297 by Marcus Maragh re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241. (mc) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed as to FCI Berlin, Warden by Marcus Maragh. Served/Mailed on 1/3/2023. Answer Follow Up on 1/24/2023. (vln) |
SERVICE BY CLERK: Copies mailed via certified mail, return receipt requested to FCI Berlin, Warden per #3 Order Directing Service.(vln) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, Certificate of Custodial Institution. Compliance Deadline set for 2/28/2023. (ed) |
Filing 1 Emergency Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241. filed by Marcus Maragh. (ed) |
NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(ed) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
Case assigned to Judge Samantha D. Elliott. The case designation is: 1:22-cv-566-SE. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Maragh v. FCI Berlin, Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Marcus Maragh | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden | |
Represented By: | Heather A Cherniske |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.