TUCKER v. LEAVITT
Plaintiff: KAREN E. TUCKER
Defendant: MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Case Number: 1:2007cv02230
Filed: May 9, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Robert B. Kugler
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER denying Pltf's 37 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 40 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 7/25/2011. (drw, )n.m.
July 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 7/12/2010. (TH, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TUCKER v. LEAVITT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KAREN E. TUCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?